Factual counterterrorism

There was a movement in the 1990s – thankfully short-lived – to write novels with several different endings and then let readers concentrate on the ending they liked best. I hated the idea. The problem I saw was that, if this trend caught on, we eventually would have few common cultural touchstones to enable us to talk with one another, and sooner or later, society would break down. How do we come to a common understanding and shared values if my version of To Kill A Mockingbird features a noble Atticus Finch teaching Scout and Jem the virtues of standing up for Tom Robinson and protecting Boo Radley while yours has Atticus taking bribes to sell out Tom so he can be sure his children have a great college fund?

Fortunately, that trend didn’t catch on, but another, equally serious trend, has, and this month’s issue of The Atlantic offers an insightful discussion of the problem. Writer Michael Hirschorn points out that the Internet too often allows untruth to masquerade as truth and to spread untruth with such speed that it picks up a life of its own. Here’s how he explains the phenomenon:

What is unique, and uniquely concerning, about digital media is the speed with which properly packaged (dis)information can spread and how hard it is for fact and reason to catch up. Sarah Palin quickly adopted Twitter perhaps because it enabled her to blast forth dramatic proclamations that, given the 140-character limit, she couldn’t be expected to explain or defend. Henceforth, election-changing controversies will be ginned up with simple, misleading phrases such as death panels or Ground Zero mosque. The fact that the Islamic cultural center in question is being built two blocks away from Ground Zero is immaterial, because laborious explanations of the truth—or even relentless mockery by Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert—cannot stop the meme from propagating like a contagious disease. Palin’s handlers like to refer to “the message” (“As the message continues to succeed, the messenger will continue to be attacked,” etc.), which is prima facie incontestable because it is not an argument. Once the meme is out there, it’s very hard to quash. No amount of evidence will stop a certain segment of the public from believing that Obama is a Muslim or foreign-born, in part because GOP leaders continue to stoke such ideas, as Newt Gingrich did with his grotesque references on September 11 to the president’s “Kenyan, anticolonial behavior.”

Hirschorn says we need “factual counterterrorism” to fight back against onslaughts of manipulation of the truth, but he points out that it’s an uphill battle. Last week I offered three websites to help you sort fact from fiction. Hirschorn offers two more – politifact.com and theawl.com.

Hirschorn has a chilling warning for us all: “It’s easy to welcome a time in which technology unleashes an ongoing town hall on any and all issues of the day, in which the wisdom of crowds holds sway. But the dislodging of fact from the pedestal it had safely occupied for centuries makes the recent disturbances in politics and the media feel like symptoms of a larger epistemological, even civilizational, rot. The next presidential election will, no doubt, be something to watch.”

Related Reading (Affiliate Link)

Thanks for visiting. While you’re here, please look around the site. You can subscribe via e-mail or RSS feed. The tools to do so are at the top of the right-hand column. To share or retweet the entry, use the buttons below. You can follow me on Twitter: @peterfaur.

This entry was posted in Communications, Politics, Society and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Factual counterterrorism

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Factual counterterrorism -- Topsy.com

  2. Ken says:

    Hmmm. So people who disagree with us are terrorists whom we must counter with the truth. Alrighty then.
    Agree completely about alternate endings for books or movies. The authors and directors are telling us, We don’t really have a point to make, so, you know, whatever.

    • Dave says:

      Nuremberg rules. Those who sat back and gave the orders are ultimately responsible and unable to hide behind many layers of plausibly deniable orders, 3rd party provers or assenters like IGs or the wheels of government.

      My personal suspicion is that since Cheney had demonstrated himself the consummate micromanager, applying oil to the wheels of government machinery at precisely the places needed to advance his sick agenda, we’ll find him orchestrating the entire thing if only someone digs deep enough. In his wildest dreams he had absolute certainty that his trail was hidden while in office and that he had Americans cowed into fear that connecting the dots would be met with a whining, accusatory litany claiming vengeful use of government, which will no doubt happen. He relied on the inherent softness of those who want civility in government. That was Cheney’s gamble, that he had the balls to do what they did and other lesser men were not cut from the same cloth and have what it takes to put 2 + 2 together once they were in a position to do so.

      Personally I think he will lose his bet and that he mistook many of the slow-to-anger, methodical, and doggedly persistent types as being softies when they are nothing of the sort. So in the end it will be his hubris that does him in.

      Maybe he should have read more Greek mythology maybe Daedalus and Icarus. One thing’s for certain, and it’s that we’ll all see.

      On another note, now Sibel Edmonds is suggesting that the Bush administration sold nuclear secrets to our enemies, and Henry Waxman has backed off the investigation of these claims. Maybe this too will play out, one way or another. It could hardly be ignored.

  3. Ken says:

    Uh, just realized my first comment was rather abrupt and rude! Sorry. Got caught up in the spirit of the argument.

    • Peter Faur says:

      Ken, I didn’t read it that way at all! And I’m all for civil conversation and disagreement. I just don’t like seeing misinformation masquerading as hard fact and spreading like wildfire. I hope we can stop the trend.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.