The cornerstone of journalism – accuracy, accuracy, accuracy

Joe Paterno

Not so long ago, the nation would have been outraged at how so many media outlets botched the answer to a simple question last weekend: Is Joe Paterno dead?

How do you get the answer? You call a reliable source, such as a family member, the Penn State University media relations office or the hospital in which Paterno was being treated. One or two calls, and you have an answer.

So how did so many media outlets get sucked into reporting last Saturday evening that Paterno was dead, when he in fact died at 9:25 eastern time Sunday morning? You can read a full account here; the short version is that the university’s student news website, Onward State, ran a story indicating that the university’s football players had received an email informing them that their former coach had died. Various media outlets, including CBS Sports and the Huffington Post, ran with the story.

To their credit, organizations like the Associated Press and the New York Times waited until Paterno’s death had been confirmed by reliable sources. The editor of Onward State apologized for the error and, in a show of integrity, resigned.

This is a perfect example of why we need responsible, disciplined newsmen and women. Fortunately, this story had no huge consequences for society. Paterno’s death wasn’t an occasion for international warfare or economic catastrophe.

Other stories, however, can have such consequences, and we can’t have huge media organizations relying on casual Twitter posts and student websites as sources. They can be leads. They can indicate that something’s going on. But then, real media organizations have to do the real work of nailing down the truth. If we lose accurate reporting, we’ve lost the very currency we use to debate and make intelligent decisions as a society.

Joseph Pulitzer used to lecture his reporters constantly about the need for “accuracy, accuracy, accuracy.” Accuracy was important in his day, and it’s important now. Let’s hope that our major media outlets use the Paterno incident as an occasion to rededicate themselves to this bedrock principle.

Chilean miners – triumph of the human spirit

Chilean miner Juan Andres Illanes Palma, the third to be rescued, acknowledges the crowd after emerging from the rescue capsule at Copiapo (AP Photo)

Like almost everyone, I’ve been watching the drama of the Chilean miners and praying for their safe return. I worked for mining company Phelps Dodge for five years, and I visited the company’s Candelaria mine near Copiapo, the miners’ home, on several occasions. In some small way, I feel connected to these miners.

Throughout their ordeal, they’ve displayed resourcefulness, toughness and great compassion. It’s hard to imagine what it would be like to be cooped up as part of a group of 33 men trapped 2,000 feet underground, especially in the early days, when the prospects for rescue were at best unclear, at worst dismal. Just holding it together, rationing what little food was available, keeping tempers in check, and not becoming despondent, was an admirable accomplishment.

My own experience with the Chilean people has been that they are warm, welcoming and delightful. They’ve gone through tremendous upheaval during the past 50 years – political unrest, nationalized industries, political coups and then a return to a more republican form of government and a market-based economy. Their experiences seem to have made them realistic, resilient and open to whatever comes their way. They enjoy the great wines they produce, the beautiful coast they inhabit, and the company of their visitors and themselves. I think the 33 miners in Copiapo accurately reflected the strengths of their culture, even arguing not over who would be the first to be rescued but instead over who would be able to make the sacrifice to be last.

I’ve thought about whether U.S. miners would have handled the situation with the same grace under pressure, and I think they would have. Mining produces tight cultures. Mining towns often are in the middle of nowhere, and families work the mine for many generations. As a result, the culture is more tightly knit and stronger than can be found in many other U.S. communities. People learn to take care of each other, and they learn to live and let live. So I think our miners would have done just as well if they’d been trapped underground.

The problem is, I’m not so sure about many of the rest of us, myself included. Especially in urban communities, we’ve gotten spoiled, we’ve lost a fair amount of self-sufficiency, and we’re used to having plenty of plenty at all times. I’d like to believe we’d find it within ourselves to be as gracious as the Chilean miners, but I’m not so sure. What do you think?

Thanks for visiting. While you’re here, please look around the site. You can subscribe via e-mail or RSS feed. The tools to do so are at the top of the right-hand column. To share or retweet the entry, use the buttons below. You can follow me on Twitter: @peterfaur.